Social Security changes mean higher benefits for certain public workers

Social Security changes mean higher benefits for certain public workers

January 15, 2025 | Bill Cass CFP®, CPWA®

As part of its year-end deliberations to avoid a government shutdown, Congress passed legislation to eliminate two provisions that have reduced or eliminated Social Security benefits for certain public employees. The bill was signed into law on January 5, 2025.

The Social Security Fairness Act will eliminate the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and Government Pension Offset (GPO), which have impacted public pension workers trying to claim Social Security benefits. The WEP affects a worker’s own Social Security retirement benefits, while the GPO may impact spousal or survivor benefits.

Since these provisions were introduced decades ago, the number of individuals affected by the rules has grown. Today, nearly three million individuals receive reduced Social Security benefits annually, according to the Congressional Research Service.1

The WEP was introduced with legislation in 1983 to address emerging solvency issues associated with Social Security. Both the WEP and GPO (established in 1977), were intended to modify Social Security benefit formulas for people who received compensation not subject to Social Security payroll taxes from receiving overly-generous payments based on their earnings covered by Social Security.

WEP and GPO only apply for workers in certain states where public employers don't participate in the Social Security system, such as public schoolteachers in 15 states. These states include Alaska, California, Connecticut, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Maine, Missouri, Nevada, Ohio, Rhode Island and Texas. There are additional states where other public employees may be impacted.

The law eliminates these provisions effective at the beginning of 2024, so impacted program beneficiaries will receive retroactive adjustments to their benefit payments. Retirees affected by the change may receive benefits that would have been due to them in 2024. The Social Security Administration is expected to announce how these retroactive benefits will be paid.

The legislative change is not without criticism, however. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that eliminating the WEP and GPO will cost the federal government more than $200 billion over the next 10 years. Certain lawmakers have expressed concern on the impact of these new changes on the overall solvency of the Social Security Trust Fund.

Pension income may have reduced benefits prior to these changes

Public employees (such as schoolteachers) slated to receive a pension, may have faced challenges if they hoped to include Social Security in their retirement planning. If an individual worked in a job that does not withhold Social Security payroll taxes, receiving a pension may result in the reduction or elimination of their Social Security benefits (assuming they also worked in a job covered by Social Security and were eligible for benefits)

Background on the WEP

The WEP ensured that workers employed in jobs that were covered by Social Security as well as public-sector employment not covered by Social Security were treated the same as government workers in jobs that did not pay into Social Security during their entire working careers. Under this provision, Social Security benefits may be reduced but not totally eliminated.  For more information on how the reduction in benefits is calculated, see the Windfall Elimination Provision online calculator. If a worker had at least 30 years of employment in a job covered by Social Security and also received a public pension, the WEP did not apply.

Prior to the WEP, those who worked primarily in a job not covered by Social Security but had some employment history with a job that was covered, were considered long-term, low-wage workers. They received a Social Security benefit based on a higher percentage of their earnings due to how benefits are calculated.

Consider this example of how the WEP reduced a retiree’s Social Security benefit:

  • 67-year-old retiree receiving $5,000 a month in pension income from public employment where Social Security payroll taxes were not withheld
  • This retiree also worked in the private sector for 10 years earning an average of $100,000 annually
table showing the difference in benefits prior to the new law

In this example, the retiree’s monthly Social Security check was reduced by $574, resulting in a loss of almost $7,000 in annual income.

Background on the GPO

The GPO provision affected individuals who earned a pension where the public employer did not withhold Social Security and who are now applying for Social Security spousal or survivor benefits based on the spouse’s earnings history. In this case, benefits would be reduced by two-thirds of the amount of the pension income. For example, consider a retiree who receives a public pension of $750 per month and applies for Social Security spousal benefits. The monthly check for Social Security spousal benefits would be reduced by two-thirds of the monthly pension amount, which in this case would be $500.

Legislation becomes law: Looking ahead

From a planning perspective, retirees who have been receiving reduced payments may want to revisit their income plans going forward to account for a change in their benefit amount. For example, while individual circumstances may vary widely, estimates from the National Education Association (NEA) suggest the average benefit would increase by $360 per month.  Current workers may want to modify their retirement plans to account for this higher benefit amount in the future and adjust their financial planning strategies.

 

Endnote

1. Source: “Social Security: The Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP),” Congressional Research Service, February 2024 (Data as of 2023).

Ref. 3718908

 

More in: Taxes, Retirement/Income

Any Putnam funds referenced in the above articles are not available for sale outside the United States.

Services provided by Putnam may not be available in all countries or to all investors. This content is not an offer to any investor who is not qualified under local law.

The views and opinions expressed are those of the fund manager above, are subject to change with market conditions, and are not meant as investment advice.

This material is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not a recommendation of any specific investment product, strategy, or decision, and is not intended to suggest taking or refraining from any course of action. It is not intended to address the needs, circumstances, and objectives of any specific investor. Putnam, which earns fees when clients select its products and services, is not offering impartial advice in a fiduciary capacity in providing this sales and marketing material. This information is not meant as tax or legal advice. Investors should consult a professional advisor before making investment and financial decisions and for more information on tax rules and other laws, which are complex and subject to change.

All funds and investment products involve risk, and you can lose money. See the prospectus for details. Any economic and performance information is historical and not indicative of future results.

If you are a U.S. retail investor: Investors should carefully consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses of a fund before investing. For a prospectus, or a summary prospectus if available, containing this and other information for any Putnam fund or product, contact your financial representative, call Putnam at 1-888-4-PUTNAM (1-888-478-8626), or click on the prospectus section to view or download a prospectus. Please read the prospectus carefully before investing.

Putnam Retail Management, LP and Putnam Investments are Franklin Templeton companies.

In the United States, mutual funds are distributed by Putnam Retail Management.